Ahadith regarding merits

A weak (da if) badith regarding the merit of a deed does not provide the grounds on which the judgment of the Shari’ah, whether something is obligatory or commendable, is to be based. However, when that judgment is once made on proper grounds, a weak hadith may be acted upon.

Ahmad Ibn Hanbal has said that in case of legal ahadith which tell whether something is lawful (halal) or forbidden (haram) we very strictly scrutinize the narrative chain (isnad), but in the case of those ahadith which exhort or warn we are quite lenient. Scholars are similarly lenient in the case of weak ahadith regarding the merits of various deeds. The judgment whether something is desirable or not is not made on the basis of ahadith which do not qualify as legal evidence. The desirability or otherwise of a deed is a legal judgment which has to be made on the basis of legal evidence. Hence, if anyone says that God loves this or that thing without giving its legal basis, he is enacting something for which he has no authority from God. Judgments on these things are made in the same way as they are made on questions of whether something is obligatory or forbidden. In fact, this is very much an important part of our religion.

The stand which the scholars take is that the judgment as to whether something is desirable or undesirable in the sight of God is to be made on the basis of a clear text (nass) or consensus, as it is done with regard to reading the Quran, glorifying God (tasbih), invocation (dud’), charity, freeing a slave, kindness towards people, or with regard to lying, breaking a trust, etc. Once we have a hadith telling the desirability of an act and the reward therefor, or the undesirability of another and the punishment therefor, we can entertain a weak hadith provided it is not fabricated (mawdu ) and act upon it. That is to say, we will expect the reward and fear the punishment which it promises. It is like the person who knows about a certain business that is profitable, and then hears a report that it has given a lot of profit; if he believes in the report he will benefit from it, but if he does not he will not be harmed. Traditions that belong to this category emerge from Jewish sources or are based on dreams or are derived from the sayings and experiences of the Elders and the scholars, none of which qualify as legal evidence. No judgment with regard to the desirability or otherwise of a thing can be passed on their basis; however, they may be used for exhortation or warning, persuasion or deterrence.

When we know about the merits or otherwise of a tradition on grounds recognized in the char’, that knowledge is useful not harmful, whether or not the tradition is true or false. If it is found to be false and fabricated, it could be ignored, for what is false is useless. But if it is found to be authentic it can be utilized in forming legal, shar ‘i judgments. But if both possibilities are open, it may be reported; for maybe it is true, and in the other case it would not do harm. Ahmad has said that when we have a hadith which exhorts or threatens we are not strict in scrutinizing the narrative chain. That is to say, the scholars report this kind of ahadith, too, even though they are not narrated by reliable and authoritative narrators. This is also the meaning of the saying that they “act upon” weak traditions concerning the merits of different works. To “act upon” means to perform the good deed which they describe, such as reading the Quran and saying dhikr, and to avoid the evil act which they mention.

This is supported by the hadith recorded by Al-Bukhari in a report of `Abdullah Ibn `Amr. The Prophet said, “Pass on to people what you hear from me, even if it is a verse (of the Quran). You may also narrate from the Jews; there is no harm in it. But whoever ascribes to me anything he knows is not true reserves his seat in Hell.”535 He has also said, “When the People of the Book narrate anything to you, neither certify it nor falsify it.”536 Thus he has permitted narrating their traditions, but cautioned against saying whether they are true or false. Obviously, if there had been no benefit in narrating from them, he would not have permitted or asked us to narrate them; and were it right to believe in their traditions, he would not have cautioned us against believing in them. People do sometimes profit from things which they think to be correct.

However, if a weak hadith of merit tells something specific with regard to an act, such as that one should offer a particular salah at a particular time, or read in it some particular verses, or offer it in a particular way, it will not be acceptable. For the desirability of these specifics is to be established on legal (shay `i) evidence which is not available. The case will be different if the hadith says, for example, that one who enters a market saying, la ilaha ills Allah (There is no god except Allah) will have this or that reward, for to remember God in the market is something very much desirable since it is remembering God when others may not be doing so. A well-known hadith says, “To remember God among those that do not remember Him is like a green tree amidst a grove of dead trees.”537 However, whether the amount of reward.

mentioned in the hadith is right or not does not matter. This is hinted at in a hadith which is reported by At-Tirmidhi: “One who receives word that God will give this or that reward for a particular deed and does it in expectation of that reward, God will grant it to him, even if it is not true.”538

To sum up, a weak hadith regarding merits, may be reported and accepted insofar as doing or not doing the said deed is concerned, but it cannot by itself establish the desirability or otherwise of that deed. Furthermore, whether the amount of reward or punishment which it specifies should be believed or not, for that, too, shar `i evidence is, needed.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawa 18:65-68] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Mistaken abstinence

The abstinence (wara`) which is approved by the shar’ is both performance of duties and avoidance of things forbidden, not just the latter. Moreover, things which are conducive to greater good should not be given up for fear of some possible evil.

I have said above that doing something obligatory is better than avoiding something forbidden and that positive actions of obedience are better than abstaining from disobedience. I have also said that the abstinence (wara ) which is approved by the shar’ is both performance of duties and avoidance of things forbidden, not avoidance only. Piety (tagwa), too, is both doing what is obligatory and eschewing what is forbidden. God has made this very clear: “Righteousness is not that you turn your faces towards East or West; righteousness is to believe in God, the Last Day, the angels, the Book and the messengers; to spend of your substance, out of love for Him, for your kin, for orphans, for the needy, for the wayfarer, and for the ransom of slaves; to practice regular charity; to fulfill the contracts which you have made; and to be firm and patient in pain (or suffering), and adversity and throughout all periods of panic. Such are the people of truth, the God-fearing, (muttaqun)” (2:77).

It follows that those people are wrong who see in a particular action or property the evil aspect which calls for abstinence from it but fail to see the good aspect which calls for its performance or use. I will cite a case which Abu Talib583 and Ibn Hamid58a have mentioned. A person died and left some money of dubious nature; he also had a debt to pay. His son who inherited the money asked Ahmad whether he should keep away from it. Ahmad replied, “Would you leave the debt of your father unpaid?” This is the proper understanding of the shar’. Paying off the debt is an obligation; the creditor has a right to the money which the debtor has left, so that in case the inheritor does not pay, he can still realize the amount from the money left by the debtor. The inheritor should not waste the money; he should not harm the dead by leaving his debt unpaid. Moreover, the creditor has a right to it. Leaving the money as such will harm both the deceased and the creditor. This will be committing two wrongs, or failing in two duties. On the other hand, if the money is used it is possible that someone else is wronged. Nevertheless, Ahmad advised the son to pay off the debt of his father from the money, for certainly it was better than wasting the money. Again, paying off the debt of his father is either a duty incumbent on him personally if no one else renders it, or a collective duty, or something much more commendable than abstaining from dubious money, because it serves a greater good.

Everyone has financial obligations. One has to spend on himself, on his kin, pay off debts, and so on. If one does not render these duties, one will be doing something definitely wrong. But if one makes use of money which is dubious, one does not do something which is definitely wrong. A Muslim is not supposed to avoid a wrong which is doubtful to commit a wrong which is definitely wrong. Said Ibn Al-Musayyib585 has said, “He is not good at all who does not like money by which he can serve his Lord, fulfill his responsibilities, help himself, and not have to depend on others.” In the Sunnah collections, we also have the saying of the Prophet (pbuh), “God must help three people, one who marries, so that he can live a chaste life; two, a slave who takes leave from his owner to earn and pay off his price; and three, a debtor who strives to pay back his debt”586 The Prophet has underlined three duties here: chaste living, earning freedom, paying off debts. So it is part of your service to God that you pay off debts, help yourself, and not depend on others. Money is necessary for rendering these duties, and what is necessary for doing something obligatory is also obligatory. Those who do not like to engage in things which are indispensable to religion are no good at all.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: RELIGIOUS VIRTUES

Source: Book: [Fatawa 29:279-80] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in RELIGIOUS VIRTUES | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Abstinence which is approved by the shar`

The zuhd which is approved by the shay` and loved by God and His Messenger is zuhd in things which are not useful for the Hereafter. But for things which are useful, such as worship, zuhd in them is sheer ignorance. Similarly, the wara’ which is approved of is abstention from things which are harmful in the Hereafter, namely things which are clearly forbidden or doubtful or things abstaining from which is less harmful than engaging in them.

Some people indulge in severe ascetic practices and suppress all appetites and irascible urges, just as the devotees among the polytheists and hermits among the People of the Book do. These people consider jihad to be a fault since it means killing men, taking women and children captive and confiscating property. They say that God denied David the honor of building the Temple because his hands were red with blood. Some, like Brahmins, forbid the slaughter of animals; others do not forbid it but only abstain from it, considering it a devotional act. They abstain from eating meat and marrying women with the same idea, extolling celibacy and applauding vegetarianism.

The Prophet has disapproved of these practices. Both collections have the hadith reported by Anas that some of the Prophet’s Companions inquired from his wives about his devotions at home. Then one of them said that he would not marry; another said that he would not eat meat; a third said that he would not sleep on a bed. When the Prophet came to know of them he went to his pulpit, praised God and said, “What has happened to these people who are saying such things! Look at me: I pray and I sleep; I fast and I eat; I marry and I eat meat. Whoever departs from my way is not of me.”578a God has said, “You who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which God has made lawful for you” (5:90). This verse was sent down in the case of Uthman Ibn Maz`un and his friends who had intended to live a life of celibacy and seclusion. The Sahfhayn have recorded the words of Sa’d that the Prophet did not allow celibacy to Uthman Ibn Maz`un, and had he allowed it they would have practiced castration.”‘

The zuhd which is approved by the shar ` and loved by God and His Messenger is lack of interest (zuhd) in things which are not useful in the Hereafter. But as for the things which are useful in the Hereafter and which contribute to happiness there, zuhd in them is lack of interest in devotion and service to God. Zuhd is approved of only in those things which are either harmful or useless, but never in things which are beneficial. The Prophet has said, “Look for things which are beneficial for you, pray for God’s help, and do not lose heart.”582

Things that are useful to man are devotion to God and obedience to His commands and the commands of His Messenger; and those which are opposite to these are harmful to him. If he performs all his actions in a spirit of devotion to God and in obedience to His commands that will be all the more beneficial to him. On the other hand, if he performs a duty or does something permitted which does not help him in serving God, he will be doing what may benefit him or may not benefit him, though it will not harm him.

Similarly, the abstinence (wara) which has been approved of by the shar’ is abstinence from things which are harmful for the Hereafter, that is, things which are clearly forbidden or which are doubtful, or abstention from which is less harmful than indulgence in them. For example, you abstain from something doubtful just as you abstain from something forbidden even though you may be needing it, and do something instead which is clearly forbidden. Or you abstain from something obligatory which will certainly be more harmful to you than if you do it without being confident about it. For example, you are to pay a debt which you or your parents owe to someone, but you do not have the required amount, though you have some other money about of which you are not sure if it is lawful; consequently you refrain from paying it, leaving the debt on you or your parents unpaid. In cases like this, to refrain from a thing about which you are not certain if it is obligatory or not is also a kind of wara’.

Perfect wara’ is when, of two alternatives available, you do what is better and avoid what is worse. Let it be known that the object of the Shari’ah is to maximize good and minimize evil; hence, if one does not compare various options, good and bad, one may leave obligatory duties and indulge in things forbidden even though one may think that one is practicing wara’. For example, one may abstain from participating in jihad under an unjust ruler, or stay away from Friday prayers or prayers in congregation because the imam leading them is guilty of some bid’ah or is not pious, or one may reject the testimony of an otherwise honest witness or refuse to listen to the view of a learned scholar because they are guilty of some minor bid `ah, and believe wrongly all the while that he is observing wara’.

The same true of raghbah, interest, and of zuhd, disinterest. Whoever is not interested in what God and His Messenger approve of and love, or turns away from what they dislike, may leave what is obligatory and indulge in what is forbidden. He may, for example, abstain from proper food or necessary fat, which may weaken his body and affect his mental faculties so that he is not able to fulfill the obligations he owes to God or to people, or he may abstain from enjoining good and forbidding evil or waging jihad in the way of God, because that causes harm to some and suffering to others, with the result that non-believers and the wicked dominate the Believers and the righteous. This man obviously fails to see what is most conducive to the good of the people.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: RELIGIOUS VIRTUES

Source: Book: [Fatawd 10:510-13]  / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in RELIGIOUS VIRTUES | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Abstinence (zuhd and wara`)

Zuhd in something is lack of desire for it, with or without a dislike for it. Wara’ is to abstain from something, to eschew it and guard against it. Hence there can be no zuhd or wara’ in things that are necessary or desirable. They are possible only with regard to things that are forbidden or undesirable. As for things that are permissible, we can have zuhd in them, not wara’.

Zuhd, lack of interest is the opposite of raghbah, desire, interest, inclination. People say A is zahid in x, that is, A has no interest in x; and B is raghib in y, that is, B is interested in y. Ragbbah is a form of will; hence zuhd is the absence of will, either with or without dislike for the thing. One can have zuhd in something if one does not will or desire it, even though one may not dislike it. If you are not interested in a thing and do not want it you are zahid in it.

In the journey to God zuhd is commendable in things in which God has commended it, such as the good things of the world over and  above  one’s  needs.  Similarly,  raghbah,  interest,  is commendable in things which God has commended and praised. That is why the journey to God begins with iradah, the will to please God. God has said, “Send not away those who call on their Lord morning and evening, seeking (yuridun) His pleasure” (6:52); and, “Those who want (arada) the Hereafter, and strive therefore with all due striving, and have faith, are those whose striving is acceptable (to God)” (17:19). Many more verses can be quoted on this subject.

God has praised zuhd, absence of desire, and has condemned avarice in many places in the Quran, for example: “Those who desire the life of the present and its glitter, to them He shall pay (the price of) their deeds therein without diminution. They are those for whom there is nothing in the Hereafter but the Fire” (11:15-6); “The mutual rivalry for piling up (the goods of this world) diverts you (from the more serious things), until you visit graves. But no, you soon shall know (the reality). Again, you soon shall know! No, were you to know with certainty of mind (you would beware)! You shall certainly see the Hell-Fire! Again, you shall see it with certainty of sight! Then shall you be questioned that Day about the joys (you indulged in)” (102:1-8); “You devour inheritance all with greed, and you love wealth with inordinate love!” (89:19-20); “Man is really ungrateful to his Lord, as he is violent in his love of wealth; and to that (fact) he bears witness (by his deeds)” (100:6-8); “The life of this world is but play and amusement, pomp and mutual boasting, and multiplying riches and children (in rivalry) among yourselves” (57:20); and so on.

Our purpose here is to distinguish between the zuhd which the shay` approves of and is therefore commendable and the zuhd which it does not, as well as between the interest which the shar’ approves of and the interest which it does not. For often zuhd is confused with dullness, inactivity and negligence in the matters of the shar’, as interest is often confused with greed, avarice and misdirected activity.

As for wara `, it is to abstain from something, to eschew it and guard against it. It involves dislike, contempt, and hatred towards its object; it is a kind of positive action. However, opinions differ whether the purpose behind it is to abstain from the forbidden object or to do the opposite; most people hold the latter view. To be sure, one cannot be called pious     (war `i) or God-fearing (muttaqi) unless one abstains and does not do what is forbidden.

If you do not do the thing forbidden you do not expose yourself to  its  harmful  consequences,  namely condemnation and punishment. And since you have eschewed it and abstained from it and engaged in something right and desirable, you deserve its good consequences, namely praise and reward. Absence of evil consequences goes with abstinence from evil deeds, and existence of good consequences goes with performance of righteous deeds.

To sum up, zuhd is the absence of desire and will for something, and wara’ is the presence of dislike and disdain towards something. You do not want to desire something unless you find it beneficial, or unless its benefits exceed its harms. On the other hand, you do not dislike a thing unless you find it harmful or its harms exceed its benefits. But if you have a thing which is neither harmful nor beneficial or whose harms cancel its benefits, then you will neither like the thing nor dislike it. You can have zuhd in such a case but not wara’. It follows that when you have zuhd you can have wars ; but not vice-versa. This is clear, for whatever is disliked and hated is neither desired nor willed. Absence of will follows upon dislike or hatred but not vice-versa, for whatever is not willed is not necessarily disliked; we do have things which we neither desire nor will, neither like nor dislike, and which are neither commanded nor forbidden.

It follows that things which have been commanded or recommended are not objects of zuhd or wara’; their objects are only those things which are either forbidden or disliked. However, things that have been permitted (mubah) may also be objects of zuhd, but not of wara’. This is not difficult to see, but you may feel difficulty in cases where it is not clear whether the thing is commanded, forbidden or permitted, or when the thing in itself is permitted but it involves other things which may either change it into obligatory or forbidden, or when it is in itself obligatory but involves something which makes it forbidden, or vice-versa. In such cases which involve both good and evil consequences, or are both beneficial and harmful, one really has a problem, and must investigate further.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: RELIGIOUS VIRTUES

Source: Book: [Fatawd 10:616-9] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in RELIGIOUS VIRTUES | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Piety (tqwa)

Tagwa is to refrain from the unlawful by doing what is enjoined or eschewing what is forbidden, particularly the… It is called tgwa, `safeguarding’, because by doing the enjoined or eschewing the forbidden one saves oneself from the wrath and the punishment of God.

Tagwa, as scholars, earlier as well as later, have stated, is to do what you are commanded to do and to eschew what you are commanded to eschew. At the time of the tragedy of `Uthman (raa), Talaq Ibn Habib575 used to say, “Guard yourself against it through tagwa.” When asked what is tgwa he said, “It is to do things in obedience to God’s commands, in light of His guidance, and in hope of His reward, and to refrain from disobeying Him, following His instructions and fearing His punishment.” God Himself has said in the largest surah of the Quran, “Alif-Lam-Mim. This is the Book; in it is guidance sure, without doubt, to those who fear God (muttaqun), who believe in the Unseen, who are steadfast in prayer, and spend out of what He have provided for them…” (2:1-4). He has thus described the muttaqun as those who have faith, and do righteous acts, such as offering saldh and paying zaka h .  He  has  further  said,  “You people!  Adore  your Guardian-Lord Who created you and those who came before you, that you may learn tagwa, righteousness” (2:21); and, “It is not righteousness that you turn your faces towards East or West. Righteousness is to believe in God and the Last Day, and the angels, and the Book, and the messengers, to spend of your substance, out of love for Him, on your kin, on orphans, on the needy, on the wayfarer, on those who ask and for the ransom of slaves; to be steadfast in prayer and practice regular charity; to fulfill the contracts which you have made and to be firm and patient in pain (or suffering) and adversity, and throughout the period of panic. Such are the people of truth, the God-fearing (muttaqun) ” (2:177). This is a great verse of the Quran, which comprehends all aspects of the religion. It was revealed in answer to a question about faith. At-Tirmidhi has recorded on the authority of Fatimah bint Qays that the Prophet said, “There are duties on wealth other than zakah.” Then he read out this verse.576 There are many more things which this verse underlines.

First, those who practice the things that are mentioned in the verse are muttaqun in the real sense; and most of the things they practice are obligatory. Second, they are the things which constitute righteousness (birr), and only those who practice them are true in their faith. Third, most of these things are positive, that is to say deeds which have been enjoined. This means that things which are enjoined are part of righteousness (birr), piety (tagwa) and faith (imdn) more so than and having priority over those which are forbidden. Fourth, one will be granted Paradise on the basis of these three things. God has referred to them in the following verse: “As for the righteous (abrar), they will be in bliss, and the wretched, they will be in the Fire” (82:13-4); “Shall we treat those who guard against evil the same as those who turn aside from the right?” (38:28); “As to the righteous (muttaqun), they will be in the midst of gardens and rivers” (54:54); “Is then the man who believes (mu’min) no better than the man who is rebellious and wicked? They are certainly not equal” (32:18). Finally, the deeds that are mentioned in the verse are obligatory; for only those people who practice them have been called “true” (sadiq) and pious (muttaqi). To be sure truthfulness (sidq) is obligatory just as faith is obligatory…

Prophets like Noah, Hid, Salih and Shu’ayb all launched their mission with the call: “Serve God! You have no other god but Him” (11:50, 61, 84). This is what is said in Surat Hid. In the surah “Poet,” their call is put in these, words, “Will you not fear God (a la tattaqun)?” (26:106, 124, 142, 151, 177),” or “Fear (ittaqu) God and obey me” (26:144, 150, 163, 179). Elsewhere in the Quran God has said, “Righteousness (birr) is that you fear God (2:189); “No, those that keep their plighted faith and act aright – verily God loves those who fear Him (muttaqun)” (13:76). Fulfill your engagements with them to the end of their term; for God loves the righteous (muttaqun)” (9:4); And “As long as they stand true to you I stand you true to them; for God does love the righteous (muttaqun)” (9:7)

God has made it clear that keeping a pledge or engagement is a part of taqwd which He loves and which is one of the obligatory duties. Obligatory duties are obligatory either because the shar’ has made them so or because they are pledged. Both are obligatory: one is fulfilling a pledge that one makes to God and the other is fulfilling a pledge that one makes to man. Tagwa is either to fear God or to fear His punishment. The Quran says, “Then fear the Fire whose fuel is men and stones” (2:24); and, “Fear the Fire which is prepared for those who reject faith” (3:131). In short, taqwd is to eschew the unlawful by doing what is enjoined or refraining from what is forbidden, particularly by the first. It is called tagwa because by doing what is enjoined and refraining from what is forbidden one saves oneself from God’s wrath and punishment. The motive behind tagwa is fear of sin, not hope for the useful or the harmless, for in that case it would be something commendable which one may do or may not do. It has been called taqwd in order to underline the fact that it is obligatory, and that one who fails in it is liable to punishment.

Another thing that I would like to point out is that if tagwa is explained as abstention from the forbidden taking clue from the verse, “Help you one another in righteousness and piety (tagwa) (5:3),  it is  supported by some Elders.  They have said, “Righteousness (birr) is what you are asked to do, and piety (tagwa) is what you are asked to eschew.” In that case tagwa will be used in conjunction with something which is obligatory such as birr. The Quran describes the call of Noah in these words, “Worship God, fear (ittaqu) Him, and obey me” (71:3). This is because tagwa implies the performance of what is enjoined.

Last, many people do a part of what has been enjoined, but only those who are true in their faith refrain from things forbidden. Sah157 has said that this is because we have an urge within ourselves to do the duty; but abstention from forbidden things is against our desires and requires warring against the self which is often difficult. That is why those who abstain are few. No one can practice abstention except when he tries to do his duties. Tagwa is not simply eschewing something, for one who eschews shirk or abstains from evil or unlawful pleasures cannot succeed unless he does what is enjoined and lawful, which may divert him from the unlawful. Hence tagwa is doing things one is asked to do and refraining from the evil ones which may harm him. On the other hand, one who does what is enjoined as well as what is forbidden, his evil deeds will spoil his good deeds, and he will not be safe. That is why salvation in `ala is for those who practice tagwa. God has said, “The (trust of the) Hereafter is for righteousness (tagwa)” (20:32); “The (best) end is for the righteous (muttaqun) ” (7:128) and, “If you are constant and do right (tattaqun), not the least harm will their cunning do to you” (3:120).

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawa 20:132-61 ] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Imitation of the Prophet (ittiba ` as sunnah)

What the Prophet has done by way of service (ta’abbud) to God is devotion (`ibadah) and is worthy of imitation. If any time or place is specified for it, it is with that specification a sunnah. To follow the Prophet is to do what the Prophet has done, as he has done, and for the purpose he has done. If he has done anything incidental,  the majority view is that its imitation is not commendable; imitation is only in things which are done intentionally.

We have been asked to believe in things which the prophets have been given and to follow their examples. God has said, “Say: We believe in God, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and      (the revelation) given to Moses, and Jesus, and that given to all .prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between one and another of them, and we submit to God alone” (2:136). And, “These are the (prophets) who received God’s guidance. Follow their example” (6:190). Muhammad (pbuh) is the Seal of the prophets; there shall be no prophet after him and his shar’ has superseded the shar’ of the earlier prophets. Hence you cannot reach God except by following him. The devotions (‘ibadah) that he has instituted and made obligatory or desirable are as he has instituted them; similarly the works that he has commended and their merits and status that he has stated are as he has commended or stated them.

No one can say that something is desirable or prescribed except on the basis of a shay `i argument. A weak hadith, it should be noted, cannot serve as an argument; however, when it is established on the basis of a shar `i argument that a certain deed is commendable, weak traditions regarding its merits can be cited provided it is not known that they are false. This is because the amount of reward is generally not mentioned. Hence, when we have a weak hadith which tells the amount of reward it should not be discarded unless it is ascertained that it is false. it is with regard to these traditions that Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and others have been lenient, just as they have been lenient with regard to the traditions of merits (fada’il). They were, however, far from establishing the lawfulness or desirability of a deed on the basis of a weak hadith. Similarly, if they had found out that a particular hadith was false, they never allowed it to be narrated except when they explicitly mentioned that it was false. The Prophet has said, “Whoever narrates a hadith, ascribing it to me and knowing that it is a lie, is one of the liars.”57

Whatever the Prophet has done by way of service (ta `abbud) to God is a devotional act `ibadah and is worthy of imitation. If he has specified any time or place for it, it is with that specification his sunnah, his example to be followed. For example, he has reserved the last ten nights of Ramadan for i `tikaf or the Magam Ibrahim for salah. Imitating the Prophet means doing what he did, as he did it, and because he did it. That is to say, we should do a thing for the same purpose for which he did it. If, for example, he took up a journey for hajj or `umrah or jihad we should also take up that journey for the same purpose. If he administered lashes to someone in order to enforce a sentence, we should administer lashes only for that purpose. It follows that if one takes up the journey but with a purpose different from the purpose he had, or participates in administering lashes but with a purpose other than his own, he is not imitating him.

With regard to the actions which the Prophet did incidentally, as for example, he camped at a particular place in a campaign, or poured water on a plant from the water he had with him, or his camel walked on a particular side of the road, and so on, one may ask the question whether to imitate him means to do these things also. Ibn `Umar572 (raa) loved to do them just as the Prophet had done them, but his righteous caliphs and the great majority of his Companions did not do them, for it was not the imitation of his example, which requires that he must have done the act on purpose. Hence, if he did not do something intentionally, just incidentally, to do that deed is not to follow him. Ibn `Umar would do the deed even if the Prophet did not do it intentionally. He thought that the Prophet’s doing it was itself something good irrespective of the way he did it and loved to do likewise, either because it would strengthen his love for him or bestow upon him the blessing (barakah) that lies in its imitation.

To the same category belongs giving out dates in sadagat al-fitr573 by a person whose staple food is something else. Ahmad seems to agree with Ibn `Umar in this matter; he allows it, following the latter’s practice. He also allows, following Ibn `Umar, touching the pulpit on which the Prophet used to sit. However, the contrary view, held by the majority of scholars that it is undesirable (makrah), is also reported of him and is said to be his predominant view. Imam Malik and other scholars are definite that such practices are undesirable even though Ibn `Umar engaged in them. Their reason is that elder Companions like Abu Bakr, `Umar, `Uthman and others did not do them. It is authentically reported that `Umar Ibn Al-Khattab once passed by a place where people used to get down and offer salah. On inquiry he was told that the Prophet once offered saldh at that place. He said “Do you want to turn the relics of your Prophet into prayer grounds? The people who went before you were destroyed for engaging in such practices. If the time for salah comes here offer the salah here; otherwise move on.”574

Opinions have also differed with regard to things otherwise lawful which the Prophet did not do intentionally. Is imitating him in those things only permissible or also commendable? Both views have been reported of scholars in the school of Ahmad as well as in other schools; we cannot go into them here. It may be noted, however, that neither Ibn `Umar nor any other Companion visited the places where the Prophet camped during his campaigns, or the houses of his wives where he passed his nights. The question here is with regard to imitation of the Prophet in the action itself, even though it is known that he did not take it as a kind of devotion. As for the places themselves, the Companions are agreed that we should only sanctify those places which he has sanctified.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawd 10:408-11 ]  / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Moderation in worship (`ibadah)

God and His Prophet love moderation in worship, and condemn excess, since the latter often leads to default in duties which are obligatory, or failure in deeds which are better and more useful, or it leads to the commission of things which are forbidden and undesirable. God does not love or approve of torturing the body or subjecting oneself to hardship. It is not true that the more arduous the act the better it is. Many ignorant people think that reward is proportionate to the hardship one suffers. No, this is not true. Reward is proportionate to the good that the act produces and the benefits that follow from it, as well as the extent or degree to which one obeys the command of God and His Prophet.

What is required of us, and what God and His Prophet want us to observe is moderation in worship (`ibadah). The Prophet has said, “Live a balanced life and pursue moderation.M7 He has also said, “This religion is well balanced. Whoever tries to stretch it in any direction shall be defeated. Therefore, take help from (the prayers of) early morning and evening, and from some of them in late night. Observe moderation, observe moderation; you will reach the destination.”" Both these ahadith are in the Sahih collections. Ubayy Ibn Ka`b,M9 a Companion of the Prophet, has said, “Moderation in practices approved (sunnah) is better than exertion in things not approved (bid `ah).”

When excessive exertion in devotion becomes harmful and hinders the performance of duties which are more beneficial, it is forbidden. An example is the fasting which weakens you so much that you are not able to earn your livelihood which is your duty, or affects your mind so much that you are unable to think properly and attend to your duties, or interferes with the jihad which is obligatory. Similar is the case of a devotional act which lands you in evils that outweigh the good it produces. For example, you give all your money in charity and then go to people begging.

If devotions render you so weak that you are not able to pursue what is better or land you in what is undesirable, they are not desirable… The Quran says: “You who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which God has made lawful for you, and commit no excess; for God loves not those who are given to excess” (5:87). This verse was revealed in the case of some Companions of the Prophet who swore in a meeting that they would give themselves to devotions. Someone said that he would fast every day; another said he would pray all night; the third said he would not eat meat; the fourth said he would keep away from women. God reproved these people in the above verse and warned them against forbidding themselves things which are lawful, like eating meat or marrying women, thereby committing excess, which is doing more than what is approved whether it is excess in fasting, praying, reading the Quran, making dhikr or anything else. Excess in forbidden things is to forbid oneself more than what is forbidden, and excess in permitted things is to indulge in them more than what is permitted. God also commanded this group of Companions to atone for the oath they had taken, an oath to forbid themselves the lawful and commit excess in devotions.

A hadith reported by Anas and recorded in both S a h i h collections says that some Companions of the Prophet inquired from his wives about his devotions at home. Then one of them said, “As for me, I will fast (every day) and will not eat.” Another said, I will pray all night and will not sleep.” The third said, “I will not marry any woman.” The fourth said, “I will not eat meat.” When the Prophet came to know this, he said, “What is the matter with these people who are saying such things? I pray and I sleep; I fast and I eat; and I marry and eat meat. Now, if anyone deviates from my way (Sunnah), he is not of me.”55°

It is also recorded in the Sahih collections that `Abdullah Ibn `Amr Ibn Al-`As began to fast every day, pray all night, and read the whole Quran in three days. When the Prophet was informed of this, He called `Abdullah and said, “Don’t do that, for if you do, your eyes will be heavy and your body will become weak.” That is to say, his eyes will sink and he will feel uncomfortable and weary. The Prophet further said, “Your body has a right over you, your wife has a right over you, and your guest has a right over you. Render to each what is his due.s551 He thus emphasized upon him that his body, his family, his friends all have rights on him, that he should not engage in so many devotions that he is not able to perform all these duties. He must render to each and every one what is his due. The Prophet then advised him to fast three days a month, saying that it would be equal to fasting the whole month. He also advised him to read the Quran in a month. But `Abdullah said that he was able to do more than that. The Prophet allowed him to do more, and then more till he said, “Fast one day and eat one day; this is the best way of fasting.” `Abdullah said, “I can do more,” whereupon the Prophet said, “There is nothing better than this. There is nothing better than this.” When `Abdullah grew old, he said he wished he had accepted the concession the Prophet had given him.552 At times he was not able to fast even on alternate days. He would eat some days and then fast an equal number of days. He did not want to do one thing during the life of the Prophet and another after him. `Abdullah did this because his body was strong enough, but if anyone fasts on alternate days which bars him from doing something better than it, fasting would not be the better thing for him to do in that situation.

The Prophet himself fasted in this way, and this was better than the fast of David (pbuh). Even so, when he was asked about fasting all year long he said, “Whoever fasts all year long neither fasts nor does not fast.”553 This is a sahih hadith. When he was asked about one who fasts for two days and eats the third day, he said “Who can do that?”" When he was asked about one who fasted one day and ate two days, he said, “I wish I could do that.”555 He was also asked about one who fasts on alternate days. He replied, “That is the best way to fast.”556 It is clear from these ahadith that he wished he could fast one third of the year, for he had to do other things which were more important for him and more dear to God, which he could not do along with fasting one third-of the year.

It is also reported in a sahih hadith that at the time he was marching on Makkah during Ramadan he asked his Companions to stop fasting, and when some people fasted against his will, he said “They are sinners!”557 Once he offered salah riding on his camel, and asked his Companions to do likewise, but one man got down from his camel and prayed on the ground. On that he said, “He is defiant. He has defied God by this act of his.”558 That man turned apostate before he died. Ibn Mas`ud559 has said, “When I fast I feel weak and am not able to read the Quran, and reading the Quran is much dearer to me.” Many more things can be said on the subject; for a fuller treatment of it one should look to another place.

If, however… one swears by God to do some such thing, or vows it, he should do it. `A’ishah (raa) has reported that the Prophet said, “Whoever vows to do something right in obedience to God should do it, but if he vows to do something defying Him, he should not do it.i560 Therefore, if the oath that you take proves harmful and leads you to negligence of duty or commission of something forbidden, you will be sinning if you fulfill your oath.

Certainly you are not required to fulfill such a vow. Similarly, if you vow to engage in a devotion which is undesirable, such as praying the whole night, or fasting all the days, you do not have to carry it out. Opinions differ on the question whether you should make expatiation for your vow. To me the correct view is that you should make expatiation. The Prophet has said, “Atonement for a vow is the same as the atonement for an ordinary oath.”56′ He is also reported to have said, “A vow is an oath.”562 In the Sunan collections we have it that he said, “There is no fulfilling of a vow which is for something sinful; however, it should be atoned for like any other oath. ,13 Al-Bukhari has recorded the hadith reported by Ibn `Abbas that one day the Prophet saw a man standing in the sun. He said, “What is this?” He was told, “This is Abu Isra’il; he has vowed that he will keep standing, that he will never go into the shade or speak to anyone, and will go on fasting.” He said, “Tell him to speak, go into the shade, sit down, and complete his fast.”" This means that when he saw a man engaged in devotions which are not approved, namely keeping silent, standing and staying in the sun, he commanded him to complete that part which is approved and give up those which are not approved.

However, if one is not able to fulfill his vow, or would put himself in hardship if he tried, then he should atone for it and do something in its place. It is reported that ‘Aqabah Ibn `Amir said to the Prophet that his sister had vowed to make hajj on foot. He said, “God does not want your sister to torture herself. Tell her to accept a ride and offer a sacrifice.”565 In another version of the hadith we have it that he commanded her to fast (to atone for her vow). 566

This man (whose case you have stated) vowed to God that he would fast half the year. But if he does it, his mind and body will be affected. He must therefore break the fast, take what improves his health and mental condition, and atone for not fulfilling the vow. He should refrain from fasting till his sanity is restored and his physical and mental health are improved. He should refrain from fasting for the period necessary, whether it is two-thirds of the year, three-fourths of it, or the whole of it. When he regains his health he may resume fasting on alternate days if it does not cause any harm, or fast however he finds useful, without turning away from things which are dearer to God than fasting. God does not want anyone to turn away from what is dearer to Him and engage in what is inferior. Obviously this man is not required to fulfill his vow.

As for the light that he experiences while fasting, the first thing to note is that acts of devotion and worship are not pure evil. Even those forms which are forbidden have some good consequences along with the evil ones. When their evil outweighs their good, the Law-giver prohibits them, as He has prohibited fasting all year long, or praying the whole night always, or offering saldh after the morning (fajr) or evening (`asr) prayers. Another thing which is to be noted is that people do see light when they fast continuously on account of the excessive hunger they experience. But this light is also seen by the infidels from among the People of the Book and the pagans, the hermits and the worshipers of graves. Excessive hunger over and above the limit allowed by the shay’ is harmful in the life here as well as in the life hereafter; its harms are greater than its benefits. I have seen many a people who engage in austere practices and severe penance ending up in frustration, inactivity, even sinful acts. They have often turned away from God altogether, or given up higher deeds for lower ones. Sometimes they have turned mad or developed some form of insanity. This is because their devotional structure is raised on foundations which are not approved by the shar’ or supported by the Sunnah.

One must know that God’s pleasure or love does not lie in torturing oneself or subjecting oneself to hardship; it is not true that the harder the work the more rewarding it is. Many ignorant people do think that reward is proportionate to the hardship one encounters. This is not true. Reward is proportionate to the usefulness of the act one performs, the good and beneficial consequences it produces, as well as the extent one obeys the command of God and His Prophet. The more useful the act and the better one carries out God’s will, the better it is. Acts are not superior or inferior on account of their quantity, but on account of what goes on in the heart while one performs the act.

This is the reason why the Prophet said to ‘Aqabah Ibn `Amir when his sister vowed to make hajj on foot, “God does not want your sister to torture herself. Tell her to accept a ride.”5′ According to another version of the hadith he commanded her to offer a sacrifice, and according to a third version, to fast (atoning for her vow).56′ He saw his wife, Juwayriyah, saying tasbih on pebbles or date pits while he visited her at noon and again after sunset. He said,  Had you said four words only three times it would have outweighed what you have been saying the whole day … 9–)569

One should know the truth, that God does not enjoin except what is beneficial for us, and does not forbid except what is harmful to us. He forbids things because they are harmful and injurious and commands things because they are useful and promote our well-being, though they do sometimes involve hardship. It is true that in making jihad or performing hajj, or enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, or acquiring knowledge, we encounter hardships. But when we bear the hardship and are rewarded for it it is because of the need which the act-produces. At the time of his farewell hajj, when `A’ishah (raa) made `umrah starting from Tan`im the Prophet did say to her, “Your reward shall be proportionate to the amount of labor you put in.”570 But if the good that the act produces is not equal to the hardship one undergoes in its performance, it will be something evil, and God does not love evil…

All that has been instituted in the shar’ is based on justice, moderation, and the principle of balance, which is the best and the noblest of all things. Firdaws is the highest grade of Paradise, and it is its best part. Hence, one who follows the principle of balance will go, God willing, to Firdaws.

This is true of all devotional acts which are not pursued for themselves, such as hunger, vigils and traveling on foot. But those which are pursued for themselves such as knowledge or love of God, turning to Him (in penitence), and trust in Him, perfection in them has been commended by the shay’. However, excess may be committed in these acts, too, by adding to them what does not belong to them. For example, in practicing trust one may discard the means which have been prescribed, or in cultivating love one may engage in what is unlawful or avoid what is lawful. One must differentiate between the two. However, knowledge is with God.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawa 25:272-84] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Major sins and minor sins

A major sin (al-kabirah) is that in which a specific punishment in this life or the next has been promised, and a minor sin (as-saghirah) is that for which nothing of the kind has been mentioned. Whenever faith is negated or Paradise is denied in a hadith, it is done only on account of a major sin.

The best thing with regard to this question is what has been said by Ibn `Abbas (raa). Abu `Ubayd, Alimad Ibn Hanbal and others have quoted him as saying that minor sins are those for which no punishment here or in `ala has been mentioned. This is also the implication of the statements such as the following: “A minor sin is that for which no specific punishment (hadd) in this life has been prescribed.” “All sins which are said to invite the wrath or curse of God or to lead to the Fire are major sins.” “Minor sins are those on which no specific punishment (jiadd) in this life has been mentioned, nor any specific warning (wa’id) with regard to the next life issued, such as that the person will be sent to the Fire or that he will incur the wrath of God or His curse.” A specific warning (wa’id) for the next life is like a specific chastisement (`uqubah) in this life. We do distinguish between specific sentences prescribed for specific sins, such as amputation of a hand, beheading, administering a hundred or eighty lashes, and unspecified sentences which are called to iir chastisement. In case of the to iir sentences, too, which God may inflict on sins not committed against human beings, we distinguish between the sentences that are referred to as the wrath or curse (of God) and the Fire, and the sentences that are not referred by any such words.

This rule is not subject to the criticism which has been advanced against other rules, for it covers all those sins which have been named major sins in any text, such as adultery, sorcery, slander against married, chaste and believing women, etc., for which one or another specific sentence has been prescribed, as well as the sins like flight from the battlefield, misappropriation of an orphan’s property, usury, disobedience to parents, false oath, false testimony, etc., on which some specific warnings have been issued. In the case of flight from battle, for example, it has been said, “If anyone turns his back to them on such a day – unless it be a strategy of war or retreat to a troop (of his own) – he draws on himself the wrath of God, and his abode is Hell, an evil refuge” (8:16). In the case of others we have these warnings: “Those who unjustly eat up the property of orphans eat up a fire into their own bodies; they will soon be enduring a blazing Fire” (4:10); “Those who break the covenant of God after having plighted their word thereto, and cut asunder those things which God has commanded to be joined, and work mischief in the land, on them is the curse, and for them is the terrible Home” (13:25); “Is it to be expected of you, if you were put in authority, that you will do mischief in the land and break your ties of kith and kin? Such are the men whom God has cursed, for He has made them deaf and blinded their sight” (47:22-3); “As for those who sell the faith they owe to God and their own plighted word for a small price, they shall have no portion in the Hereafter, nor will God (deign to) speak to them or look upon them on the Day of Judgment, nor will He cleanse them (of sin). They shall have a grievous penalty” (3:77).

Similarly, all those sins are grave whose perpetrators are told that they will not enter Paradise, or that they will not have its fragrance, or that they “do not belong to us,” or that they are sinners (athim); all such sins are major sins. Read, for example, these ahadith: “No one will enter Paradise who severs his relations with kith and ki;s539 “No one who has a particle of arrogance in his heart will go to Paradise;”540 “Whoever cheats us is not of us”" “Whoever takes up a sword against us is not of us;”542 “No one who commits adultery is a believer at the time he is committing it; no one who steals is a believer at the time he is stealing; no one who drinks wine is a believer at the time he is drinking; no one who plunders the property of a respectable man people look up to is a believer at the time he is plundering… “43

This is because to negate the faith of the sinner or to deny that he is a believer does not mean what the Murji’ah say, that he is not one of their good men; for if he gives up that sin it will not follow that he is one of their good men. Nor does it mean what the Khawarij say, that he has become an unbeliever (kafir), nor even what the Mu’tazilah say, that he has lost faith altogether, and that he shall abide in Hell for ever and never come out. All these views are wrong; we have discussed them at length elsewhere where they may be consulted.

The truth in this regard is that the Believers who deserve Paradise and will enter it without any chastisement are those who fulfill the duties which are obligatory and eschew the things which are prohibited. They are those who are meant when the word Believers (mu’minun) is used without any qualification. So when someone commits these major sins, he is not one of such Believers, for he is liable to be punished for his sins. This is what people mean when they say that the Prophet only means to negate the true faith or the perfect faith, for certainly they do not mean to deny only the perfection which is desirable since the absence of that perfection does not call for condemnation or punishment.

Hence, those who say that by the negation of perfect faith only the negation of the faith which is desirable and not necessary is meant, they are wrong; their view is very much like the view of the Murj i’ ah. The truth is that the negation of faith in the ahad i th quoted above is the negation of the faith which is necessary. This rule should be applied to all the statements of God and the Prophet in which they negate faith or anything else. Take, for example, the verse, “Believers are those alone who, when God is mentioned, feel a tremor in their hearts, and when they hear His signs rehearsed find their faith strengthened, and put (all) their trust in their Lord, who establish regular prayers and spend (freely) out of the gifts We have given them for substance. Such in truth are the Believers” (8:2-4). Or note the hadith, “He does not have faith who breaches a trust, and he does not have religion who does not keep his word.”- “40r the hadith, “There is no salah without the Mother of the Quran, (i.e. Al-Fatihah),”Sa5 and so on. In all these examples faith is negated because some necessary part of it is missing, and hot something which is only desirable but not necessary. They all mean that whoever fails in the qualities mentioned fails in something necessary, something without which his faith is incomplete, even though he has a part of it. This is because faith has parts, and is more or less. The Prophet has said, “He who has a particle of faith in his heart shall be taken out of the Fire.”16

To sum up, denying faith or Paradise to someone or denying that he is a Believer means that he has committed something grave. This is not done in case of one who commits any minor sin. Faith is not denied for failing in a part which is merely desirable, nor for committing any minor sin, only for a major one.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawa 11:650-4]  / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Is the reward proportionate to the hardship involved

A superior deed may be more exacting, but its superiority is certainly not due to the hardship it involves, but for other reasons. In fact, hardship is not something desirable in itself, but patient pursuit of a superior deed which is exacting wins greater reward, and the more exacting it is the greater the reward for it.

The saying that reward is proportionate to the hardship involved is not absolutely true. The proof is that various monastic and devotional practices which were in vogue among the people were disapproved by God and His Prophet and the restrictions which had been placed on lawful articles by the pagans were removed by them. Excessive indulgence in devotion and hair-splitting were forbidden. “The extremists, al-mutanatti `un,” the Prophet warned, “are doomed”528 On another occasion he threatened, “If the month were extended I would go on fasting without break, so that those who are indulging in excess might give in. ,12′ He also proscribed excessive hunger and thirst which affects the mind or the body, or hampers the performance of duties, or bars the pursuit of commendable deeds which are more profiting. We may place in the same category going barefooted, refusing to wear clothes, and walking long distances, which may prove harmful. A man called Abu Isra’il had vowed to fast standing in the sun without sitting for a moment and keeping silent all the while. The Prophet commanded him to sit down, go into the shade, speak, and complete his fast.53o This has been recorded by Al-Bukhari. There are other ahadith also on the subject.

Reward is for obedience and is proportionate to the measure of obedience one offers. Sometimes one pleases God and His Prophet by doing things which are very small, for example, when one says the two small sentences which are the best of all that one can say. The Prophet said, “Two sentences are light on the tongue. but heavy in the Balance and very dear to God: Subhana Allah (Glory to God), and Subhana Allah Al- `Azim (Glory to God, the Great).”53′ Both Al-Bukhari and Muslim have recorded this hadith.

The saying that reward is proportional to the benefits that accrue from the work is also true. The first criterion concerns the command itself; the second concerns the nature of the thing commanded. The benefit of a deed may sometimes be due to the fact that it is commanded, sometimes to some characteristics found in the deed and sometimes to both. From the first point of view one’s action is either obedient or sinful, and from the second point of view it is either good or bad. We call it obedient or sinful when we look at it in relation to the command given, and good or bad when we look at it in itself…

As for its being difficult, that is no reason for calling it superior or better. However, it is true that a superior deed is sometimes hard, but its superiority is certainly not due to the hardship which it involves. To be sure, patiently bearing the hardship does increase the reward, and in that sense hardship adds to the reward. One who lives far away from the House of God will have greater reward for his hajj or `umrah than one who lives nearby. This is supported by what the Prophet (pbuh) said to `A’ishah (raa): “You are rewarded according to what you exert. ,532 The reward depends upon the effort that is made, and the greater the distance the greater the effort, and hence the greater the reward. The same is true of jihad. Another hadith that supports the point is this: “One who reads the Quran very well shall be, along with scribes from among the angels, honorable and righteous; but one who reads and stammers and does it with difficulty shall be doubly rewarded.”533

Often rewards increase with the hardship one faces and the labor one puts in, but this is not because suffering hardship is the object; on the contrary, reward increases because the deed involves hardship. The burdens and yokes of the former days have been removed from our Shari’ah; we have not been subjected to hardship or put to trouble. In the earlier codes, that might have been a part of the purpose. Many people think that hardship, difficulty, labor or suffering is something desirable, and that it wins God’s pleasure because it robs the soul of its pleasure, turns it away from worldly goods and frees the heart from submission to the body. But this is simply a Sabaean or Indian view. That is why these people engage like hermits in various austere practices and devotions which are severe and painful even though their benefits are very small in comparison to the great harm and suffering they cause. The same mentality is at work in the praise which the ignorant give to those who neither marry nor eat meat, and follow the way of the hermits. The sincere servants of God, on the other hand, follow the way of the Prophet, who has said, “I fast and I eat; I marry women, and I eat meat. Those who do not follow my example are not of me.”53a

These practices are part of a false religion. They are to be censured just as love of the world should be. People are of different kinds. Some are purely this-worldly; they hardly think of the Hereafter. Some have a false religion; they are infidels and heretics who believe in devotions and austerities God has not approved. There is the third group, which believes in the true religion, which is Islam, and adheres to the Quran, the Sunnah and the community (jama`ah).

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawd 10:620] / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off

An inferior deed may be preferred sometimes

If it is possible for someone to do many things of the faith he should do what pleases God most and what he can do better, even though it is inferior to others. This is better in his case.

One has to have the faith (iman) which is necessary, perform the worship (`i ba d a h) which is obligatory, and practice the abstinence (zuhd) which is compulsory. People differ in their faith, just as they differ in doing the things which faith demands. Everyone tries to have what he can achieve and do the good deeds he is capable of. In these matters people certainly do differ. For some, knowledge is easier than abstinence (zuhd); for others, abstinence is easier than knowledge; and for yet others, devotion (`ibadah) is easier than both. What is required of a person, therefore, is that he do the best he can. God has said, “So fear God as much as you can” (64:16). If he can do a number of things, he should do what is dearer to God, and what he can do better. It may happen that one does an inferior thing better and gets more from it than from doing the deed which is superior. Obviously, he should do what profits him more; that is certainly better for him. He should not go for the superior if he cannot do it or finds it very difficult. A person may read the Quran at night, ponder it and profit from reading it, whereas he may find salah hard for him and may not profit from it at all; or he may benefit from dhikr more than he benefits from reading the Quran.

The work which profits the doer more and pleases God better is better for him to do than that which he cannot do properly which he may spoil and thus lose what was more profitable to him. We know that salah is more important than reading the Quran, and reading the Quran is better than dhikr and dud’. We also know that dhikr on certain conditions, in bowing and prostration, for example, is better than reading the Quran in that position, and that dhikr, reading the Quran, and du `a’ at sunise and sunset are all better than salah at these times.

Author: Ibn Taymiyyah

Islamic Topic: SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD

Source: Book: [Fatawd 7:651-52]  / Also mentioned in “Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds on Islam

Posted in SULUK: JOURNEY TO GOD | Tagged , , | Comments Off